The House of Representatives turned rowdy on Wednesday as lawmakers argued over a motion calling on President Bola Tinubu to explain the alleged non-funding of constituency projects.
The disagreement started while the House considered a motion by the member representing Aba North/Aba South Federal Constituency of Abia State, Alex Ikwechegh, who complained about poor funding of approved budgets and repeated delays in releasing capital funds to Ministries, Departments and Agencies.
The motion followed a Constitutional Point of Order raised by the member representing Okpe/Sapele/Uvwie Federal Constituency of Delta State, Benedict Etanabene. He told the House he had seen a circular from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation announcing the suspension of funding for zonal intervention projects pending fresh verification requirements.
The debate split lawmakers across party lines, with many expressing anger over what they described as the slow execution of projects approved by the National Assembly. Although most members backed the motion, loud protests drowned out those trying to oppose parts of it, forcing the Speaker to restore order several times.
Presenting the motion titled, “Urgent need to address the poor funding of appropriated budgets and delayed releases to MDAs as revealed during the 2026 budget defence sessions,” Ikwechegh argued that passing a budget alone was not enough if funds were not released on time.
He said, “The powers of appropriation in the National Assembly, and the credibility of the budget rests not only on the size of the figures appropriated, but on the fidelity, timeliness with which appropriation funds are released, cash-backed, and utilized for ministries, departments, and agencies.
“The House also notes that during the 2026 budget defence sessions, honourable Ministers and heads of MDAs disclosed deeply troubling levels of funding of 2025 budget, including sectors that recorded zero capital releases for the entire fiscal year, and others that received only a token, a fraction of their appropriated capital votes.
“The House is aware that these disclosures are consistent with repeated protests staged in 2025 and early 2026 by indigenous contractors of Nigeria that have invested heavily to do business with the Nigerian government at the Federal Ministry of Finance and at the gates of the National Assembly; on one occasion, disrupting plenary sittings because due to unpaid certificates for completed and verified projects with many contractors unable to service bank loans obtained to execute government projects.”
Ikwechegh recalled that President Bola Tinubu, during a Federal Executive Council meeting on December 10, 2025, ordered the immediate payment of verified contractor liabilities estimated at about N1.5tn and approved an inter-ministerial committee to reconcile records and speed up payments.
According to him, “The House is also aware that His Excellency President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at the Federal Executive Council of 10th December, 2025 expressed grave displeasure at the backlog, directed the immediate settlement of verified contractor liabilities of about N1.5tn and constituted an inter-Ministerial Committee to harmonise records and deliver a lasting funding solution, declaring his readiness of the government to even borrow when necessary to settled verified obligations.
“The House is further aware that directive of the National Assembly approved the borrowing in excess of N1tn specifically to finance the settlement of outstanding obligations on completed and verified capital projects, in addition to dedicated provisions in the 2026 Appropriation Act for contractor liabilities, while the Honourable Minister for Finance have announced the clearance of substantial sums announcements, which contractors dispute as partial announcements.”
He said he was worried that despite the President’s directive, legislative approvals and ministerial assurances, funding to MDAs remained slow.
“The House is concerned that notwithstanding the clear directive of the President, the legislative approvals and the ministerial assurances releases to MDAs remain slow, if I may say unexistent, stalling critical projects, escalating contract costs, exposing contractors to insolvency, and rising non-performing loans and eroding public trust in the budget of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, approved by this parliament.”
Ikwechegh also criticised a Treasury circular dated June 29, 2026, reportedly issued by the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, which requires a Certificate of Verification and Compliance from the Federal Ministry of Special Duties and Intergovernmental Affairs before constituency project payments can be made.
He said, “The House is disturbed by recent newspaper reportage of a federal treasury circular dated 29th June, 2026 issued by the Office of the Accountant General of the Federation, halting payments for zonal intervention and constituency projects, unless a certificate of verification and compliance is first obtained from the Federal Ministry of Special Duties and Intergovernmental Affairs, a directive which however well-intentioned, introduces yet another layer of bureaucratic bottlenecks at the very moment Mr President has demanded speed and risks turning back the hands of the clock by subjecting duly appropriated, procured, and executed projects to further delay.”
He added, “Accordingly, the House resolves to commend first Mr President for his directive on the immediate settlement of the verified contractor liabilities, and urge his full, faithful, and speedy implementation by Fiscal authorities, and we also want to urge the President, as a father of the nation, to make out time, since we have invited Ministers, invited Security Chiefs, invited different members of the Economic Council to come here and explain to us why the budget is not being implemented.”
Earlier, Etanabene urged the House to use its constitutional oversight powers to invite President Tinubu and his economic team to explain the reported suspension of constituency project funding.
Citing Sections 4, 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), he said the National Assembly had a duty to demand accountability over budgets it approved.
He said, “I wish, Mr Speaker, that the Constitution be tested. I want to urge this House to agree that we summon Mr President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria together with his financial team to please come to this House in line with the provision of the Constitution to brief Nigerians exactly what is happening, because the stories are not complimentary at all.
“We cannot explain to the constituents what is happening. Today, we collect money. We will not be able to give a proper explanation for it. The budgets are not being implemented. Presently, in Nigeria today, we are implementing 2024, 2025 and 2026 budgets running concurrently. This is not in the best interest of everybody.
“So, Mr Speaker, I wish to move the motion that this House invite Mr President to come and explain and make us know the need for this circular that has been released.”
However, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas ruled that the proposal to summon the President could not be adopted, saying it was against parliamentary practice.
According to the Speaker, “the issue of summoning the President as included in the debate of Hon Ikwechegh cannot not be adopted by the House,” noting that “such action is unparliamentary.”
The House later adopted the main resolutions of the motion, urging the Federal Ministry of Finance, Budget Office of the Federation, Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and the Central Bank of Nigeria to give priority to the timely release and cash-backing of approved funds, publish a clear 2026 release timetable and complete the verification and payment of outstanding contractor liabilities within a publicly announced timeframe.
